Plasma Pool

Icon

a set of sharp and cogent notes

Stuff We Like

  • F for Fake

    This is Orson Welles's masterpiece, a virtuoso performance of sound and video editing that co-opts the documentary but is not one. It is the rare postmodern text that's laugh out loud funny, steeped in the relativism of the post war period but not held hostage by it. He appears as himself, sheared of doubts and humanity, in full possession and knowledge of his genius, but he is not the subject (excuse my language) of the film. It's a "film about trickery, fraud and lies," and about two great exponents of those arts, Elmyr de Hory and Clifford Irving. The film is not much watched by people from any generation, met with cold critical reception on release, how can it be Welles's masterpiece? But it is, and is neglected due to its translation from the dross and palaver of our late capitalist society in which relativism extends mainly to the comparison of ledgers, a number of hard, unpleasant truths about meaning, about value, and about our modern oracles, the experts. Or as Welles says of art (or anything): "How is it valued? The value depends on opinion. Opinion depends on the expert. A faker like Elmyr makes fools of the experts, so who's the expert? Who's the faker?"

  • Ferret-Legging

    Ferret-Legging

    The ferret goes in your pants. Your pants are cinched to prevent its escape. Then you stand there while a scared rodent scratches, bites, and generally freaks the fuck out in the vicinity of your manly-bits. He who endures the longest wins. There you have the “sport” of ferret-legging, a Yorkshire coalminer practice now revived at the Richmond, VA Celtic Festival. While I cannot speak for the rest of the Plasma Pool team, I have not personally experienced the joy of ferret legging – nor do I have any desire to do so in the future. But what should be Liked about this particular Stuff is not corporeal, but rather its statement about the competitive nature of man such that he would trap a ferret in his pants for over five hours for no reward but the knowledge that he did what no other man could do. There exists in each of us a compulsion to strive for greatness, and in the course of this pursuit we are capable of unimaginable sacrifice in the name of achievement. Today humanity faces new and difficult challenges, but what drives these semi-sane “athletes” is the same that drives those in more noble fields to cure diseases, create art, and improve humanity in countless other ways. So, thank you ferret-leggers. Just keep that animal away from my junk.  -- Donny Bridges

  • Reactions to the OJ Simpson Verdict

    OJ Simpson Verdict

    Without getting into any kind of commentary about the trial itself or its place in pop culture memory, this video of the OJ Simpson verdict is stunning. Pay attention to 1:24, 2:10, 3:30, 3:59. The camera pans over a near-complete spectrum of emotions, almost oblivious to the murmur of the verdict while the faces hang on to every word. The calm voice at the end advises to "expect the worst." For me, the bizarre essence of the clip is that some idea of "justice" is located somewhere in the physical and conceptual space between the rows of silent faces and the implied source of the unseen voices. The mass of bodies tenses and contorts as an articulation of the disembodied speech of the justice system. I am reluctant to give a reading of all this beyond this cursory description, but one final thing to consider is that our detached gaze is nearly embedded in the perspective of the invisible jury, who sits at the center of the verdict.  -- Scott Coomes

From the Vault

Things that died in 2008.

Our president pledged as primary candidate to staunchly defend individual civil liberties and curb the domestic intelligence abuses of the Bush Administration. As the Democratic candidate, he hedged. As president-elect, he made stunning about-faces, notably on immunity for telecommunications companies who cooperated with Bush's illegal requests. Now, as president, he's continued as many of Bush's abuses as he's curtailed. Also, there was a time when John McCain wasn't an unprincipled, dishonorable bigot. He was quite the man, when he was a man. Then came a succubus to hasten his by then inevitable decline.

Adolf Hitler Taken Into State Custody

Kevin Hilke

Heath, Adolf, and Deborah Campbell

Heath, Adolf, and Deborah Campbell

In mid-December of last year, parents Heath and Deborah Campbell, 35 and 25 respectively, went to a New Jersey ShopRite to get a cake for their son’s third birthday. For the third time in three years, the bakery personnel refused the Campbells’ request that their son’s full name, Adolf Hitler Campbell, be printed on the cake. ShopRite spokeswoman Karen Meleta said at the time that Heath Campbell had in previous years requested cakes with swastikas; these requests were similarly denied because, Meleta said, ShopRite “reserve[s] the right not to print anything on the cake that we deem to be inappropriate.” The Campbells ended up at a Pennsylvania Wal-Mart, where their request was obliged without complaint.

Today comes news that Adolf and his younger siblings, JoyceLynn Aryan Nation Campbell (just shy of two years old) and Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie Campbell (seven months old), have been taken from their parents:

Three New Jersey siblings whose names have Nazi connotations have been placed in state custody, police said. The children, ranging in age from 3 to under 1, were removed from their home Friday. [...]

State workers didn’t tell police why the children were taken, police Sgt. John Harris said.

A spokeswoman for the state Division of Youth and Family Services, Kate Bernyk, said she would not comment on any specific case, but she said the state would not remove children from a home simply because of their names.

A family court hearing is scheduled for Thursday. Court officials said the matter is sealed and they could not release information about what might be decided at the hearing.

While I understand the need for child services to keep the particular details of the investigation under wraps, if the children are not returned to the Campbells after Thursday’s hearing, the office must act quickly to inform the public of the countours of the state’s substantive case against the couple. If no new information is presented by the state, this case will continue to appear, at least on its face, to be about freedom of speech. All the Campbells have done, as far as we know, is eccentrically express their especially virulent racism. However repugnant, that is not a crime. Without additional justification for separating the children from their parents, the case will be easily exploited by domestic anarchist movements, especially Aryan ones, as proof of the government’s contempt for privacy and fundamental hypocrisy. We should trust the state that such a justification exists, but that trust must be vindicated very soon; if it is not, the state will be legitimately open to such charges. Repugnance, however fiercely or communally felt, does not constitute grounds for separating parents from their children.

Category: Briefs, Policy and Politics, Thought and Society

Tagged: , , , , , , ,

One Response

  1. jesse cruis says:

    wow. this is crazy. im studying the holocaust in school and i find this very interesting. Im stunned

Leave a Reply

The Plasma Spring