Plasma Pool

Icon

a set of sharp and cogent notes

Stuff We Like

  • The Vice Guide to North Korea

    North Korea

    This brilliant and disturbing documentary takes you deep into the shallows of Kim Jong Il’s hermit kingdom. Somehow, Vice Magazine’s Shane Smith (founder of VBS, Vice’s video division and star of their Guide to Travel series) and a clandestine-camera-wielding companion secure passage into North Korea from China -- pretending to be tourists, of course, because journalists go to jail. For an hour Smith explores the thin, saccharine veneer of majesty and might that the dictatorship uses to obscure the truth about the desperately impoverished and broken country. He mingles with eerily upbeat hosts, waitresses and tour guides, all hand-picked to chaperone him 24/7 during his stay (the pretense of which is to view and report on the Arirang Mass Games, a spectacular orgy of propaganda and gymnastics too baffling for words). Complete with a heartbreakingly awkward karaoke rendition of the Sex Pistol’s "Anarchy in the U.K.," this documentary is a must-see: a visceral primer for anyone interested in understanding the uniquely other-worldly yet backwards North Korea.  -- Adam Schaefer

  • The Art of Marco Fusinato

    Marco Fusinato

    Music, math, the interactive: these are three things that I really like, and Marco Fusinato's art includes them all. Mass Black Implosion is probably my favorite of his projects -- it reimagines musical scores, sometimes by overlaying them with scribbles of varying thickness (maps to some imagined territory), in architecturally-precise lines (an explosion into three dimensions), or as some kind of gloriously strange infographic for the world to come. Aetheric Plexus, in sharp contrast, turns audiovisual detail into interactive assault. It's difficult to get a sense of the scope of some of these works, but it's evident that Fusinato's gallery showings include a vast collaborative and musical component -- I'd love a chance to see some of this stuff live -- and I'm quite taken with his curatorial series You Don't Have to Call it Music, which tasks visual artists to create music.  -- Lauren Caldwell

  • Dianne Wiest's Old Face

    Dr. Gina Toll

    Dianne Wiest first struck me as the standout of Hannah and Her Sisters; then as the Law & Order DA who tells Sam Waterston what to do and how to think. She aged between these roles and now is even older, the offbeat beauty of her youth having morphed into a mature visage of both astonishing expressiveness and grandmotherly inscrutability — a crucial element of her facile and felicitous performance as psychotherapist Gina Toll on HBO's In Treatment. Psychotherapy is a delicate, hyper-pressurized encounter in which change rests on an enduringly empathetic therapist (who is also capable of being perceived as such) imbuing contingent actions and words with novel meanings and potentialities. Gina's patient Paul, a former protégé who returns for guidance after a decade of estrangement that began when Gina denied him a promotion, is ever probing Gina's face for nefariousness. A sleepy spider lying in wait, is what Paul calls her: What secret motives lie covertly in the fragile folds of her jowls, in the puffy bags beneath her eyes, etched on her weblike cheeks? Her enigmatic expressions initially offend Paul, whose history with Gina predisposes him to read any ambiguity in her mien as perfunctorily negative. Not sharing this pervading bias, we enjoy the virtuosic, Emmy-winning face of this gorgeous old lady whose allure and gravitas make me want to ask her to run for president.  -- Kevin Hilke

From the Vault

Things that died in 2008.

Our president pledged as primary candidate to staunchly defend individual civil liberties and curb the domestic intelligence abuses of the Bush Administration. As the Democratic candidate, he hedged. As president-elect, he made stunning about-faces, notably on immunity for telecommunications companies who cooperated with Bush's illegal requests. Now, as president, he's continued as many of Bush's abuses as he's curtailed. Also, there was a time when John McCain wasn't an unprincipled, dishonorable bigot. He was quite the man, when he was a man. Then came a succubus to hasten his by then inevitable decline.

Mad Men: The Moon, Don!

Darren Franich

Did Jon Hamm lose weight this season? Or did they just change the lighting so that his proud Captain America face (aside: “Football hero who hates his father” officially enters the lexicon as a synonym for upper-middle class successful male ennui) began to look gaunt, malnourished, the face of a noir anti-hero who ends up bleeding alone in a getaway car? Back in the season premiere, I was worried that Hamm looked more like a wax imitation of Don Draper than a real person — here’s old Don, bedding an eager stewardess and making you believe there is fog in London! But then “Seven Twenty Three” happened, the middle episode of the season which left Don toadishly signing his life away, modeling the Chinatown nose-bandage which can only symbolize impotence and ruin.

I think you’re hitting on something, Eric, something which only became clear as the back half of the season played out: Season 3 was about Destruction, but the quiet kind of destruction. We saw JFK die, an event which Weiner once claimed he didn’t feel like showing, because what was left to say? Well, Weiner managed to be the first person in years, maybe decades, to say something new about the JFK assassination: far from changing everything and spoiling everyone’s fun and destroying Camelot, it was the best thing to happen to the characters all season. It opened their eyes.

In a nutshell, Season 3 felt weird because it mostly took place geographically in the corpse of Season 2. Almost every key plot point developed from decisions that were made last season — the purchase of Sterling Cooper, the revelation of Don’s adultery, the Draper’s shotgun reconciliation, Joan’s engagement, Roger’s new marriage. In a sense, all of these decisions were bad ideas, and the genius of Season 3 was in seeing just how long it took the characters to figure that out. (Conversely, the one professional and personal success story all season was Harry Crane, who took a gamble on television and ended up the all-important sixth man at Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce dot dot dot Campbell, if Pete has his way.)

I’m intrigued, Eric: how did you feel about the final three episodes, which struck me as the most Dick Whitman-centric since season one? (I guess you could count Don’s trip to LA, but that felt more like a leisurely escapist dream, complete with European decadents who vanish in the night.) I know you’ve never been a fan of the Whitman stuff, but I felt like the final three episodes were practically about the death of Don Draper and the rebirth of Dick Whitman’s soul.

First, he expurgated his life story, the first time he’s ever told anyone a thing about himself besides Rachel Menken; and if he had ever been afraid that Betty would leave him if she found out, then he must have felt a bit of relief when she actually did. Then, he gave up on pleasing his substitute father, Connie, and decided to take matters into his own hands. It was another identity rebirth, a shapechange, but this time he was taking other people with him. In a moment that could have seemed mawkish, he walked into his new hotel room office and grinned at his new co-workers.

I couldn’t be more excited about Season 4, though the AMC preview that played right after Mad Men’s finale got me uncommonly excited about the intriguing persona the whole channel is adopting (The Prisoner, Breaking Bad, and Mad Men are all shows about people with secret identities — motif alert!) What do you think Season Four will bring? I’d be sad to see Ken, Paul, and Smitty go, but I think this show could do with a minor cast-cull before it gets overextended. Also, is Don/Peggy the hottest non-sexual couple on TV?

Category: Art and Culture

Tagged: , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

The Plasma Spring