Politics
Darren Franich
In a world in which the president was talking about defending the institution of marriage from activist judges—which is kind of like defending the institution of spelunking from firefly ninjas; or defending the institution of friendship from Hitler—this was like the voice of a loving relative talking you out of a coma nightmare, reminding you that there was a real world where Republicans stood for things and Democrats stood for things and they could argue about those things until the end of time, but that all of those things had a basic ring of truth. McCain wasn’t the Republican who Democrats could love; he was the Politician who Sane People could love, cutting through the endless bounds of bullshit and trying to just, well, talk to people. That was straight talk, and no bullshit. Now, he’s all bullshit, all the time.
Politics
Doc Edge
In arguing that gay marriage jeopardizes their religious freedom, Prop 8’s proponents have failed to make a crucial distinction. Secular marriage is the mechanism the state uses to keep track of life partners for administrative purposes. Sacred marriage is a blanket term for a number of institutions specific to individual sects and religions. Many couples are united both by secular marriage and by some form of sacred marriage, but despite their correlation, secular and sacred marriage do not imply each other. It is easy to imagine a couple that would like to be married by their church but not in the eyes of the state, or vice versa. Clearly separating these ideas reveals holes in all arguments regarding infringements of Prop 8’s supporters’ religious rights and shows gay marriage to be not an issue of religious freedom, but one of equal protection under the law from gender-based discrimination.